1v1 Pricing Showdown
Proposify vs Qwilr
Side-by-side pricing breakdown for Proposal & Document Software decision-makers
Prices in USD, verified from the United States. Regional pricing may vary.
When choosing between Proposify and Qwilr for your proposal & document software stack, the right answer depends on three things: your budget, the specific features you actually use day-to-day, and your tolerance for renewal-price increases. Below we lay out the prices each vendor advertises today (verified against their live pricing pages), the plan limits that decide whether they'll fit your team, and the features that differ between them.
Proposify starts at $19/mo; Qwilr starts at $35/mo. The cheaper headline price isn't always the cheaper total cost — renewal pricing, per-user fees, and overage charges can shift the math. Use the plan-by-plan tables below to model your actual spend.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| e signatures | All plans | — |
| document tracking | All plans | — |
| document analytics | Team+ | — |
| integrations | Team+ | — |
| automations | Team+ | — |
| custom fields variables | Team+ | — |
| crm integrations | Team+ | — |
| workflow automation | Team+ | — |
| unlimited templates | Business+ | — |
| user roles permissions | Business+ | — |
| sso | Business+ | — |
| api access | Business+ | — |
| multiple workspaces | Business+ | — |
| premium onboarding | Business+ | — |
| overage fees | $0.30-$0.75 per additional document | — |
| unused sends accumulate | Monthly | — |
| support hours | Mon-Thu 8a-8p ET, Fri 8a-4p ET | — |
| interactive web proposals | — | All plans — not PDFs |
| content editor | — | All plans |
| e sign | — | All plans |
| qwilrpay | — | All plans — embedded payment collection |
| pricing quotes | — | All plans |
| page analytics | — | All plans |
| hubspot crm | — | Business+ |
| salesforce | — | Enterprise |
| account manager | — | Enterprise |
| custom branding | — | Enterprise |
| team permissions | — | Enterprise |
| identity verification | — | Enterprise |
| domain restricted access | — | Enterprise |
| template level settings | — | Enterprise |
| 14 day free trial | — | Business plan, no CC required |
| no starter plan | — | Business is lowest tier |
Affiliate links — you pay the same price
Dive Deeper
About the proposal & document software category
Proposal software in 2026 has bifurcated from 'just send PDFs' to three distinct camps. 'SMB document editor + e-sign' (PandaDoc $19-49/user/month, Better Proposals $19-49/user/month): collaborative document creation with signing workflow, mid-market pricing. 'Interactive web proposals' (Qwilr $35-59/user/month): proposals as interactive web pages with embedded video, pricing calculators, payment collection — outperforms PDF proposals on engagement but requires prospects to view in browser vs download. 'Sales-focused with deal rooms' (Proposify $19-41/user/month, PandaDoc Business $49): templates + pipeline integration + acceptance tracking — built for account executive workflows. 'Enterprise contract lifecycle management (CLM)' (DocuSign CLM custom, typically $30-50/user/month with 100-user minimums): full contract lifecycle from proposal to renewal with redlining, approval workflows, contract repository, obligations tracking. Distinct from pure e-signature tools (DocuSign eSign, HelloSign, covered in our e-signature niche). The 2024-2026 shift: AI-generated proposals are table stakes — every vendor has AI draft tools. Differentiation is in workflow depth (deal rooms, approval chains) and CRM integration quality (HubSpot, Salesforce bidirectional sync).
How to choose between proposal & document software options
First: what's your proposal volume per user? Under 10 proposals/month: PandaDoc Starter $19/user/month or Proposify Basic $19/user/month (10 sends/month). 10-50/month: PandaDoc Business $49/user/month (unlimited) or Proposify Team $41/user/month. 50+/month: Qwilr Business $35/user/month (unlimited) or enterprise tiers with volume discounts. Second: what's your deal size? Under $10k deals: PDF proposals via PandaDoc Starter are fine. $10k-$100k deals: Qwilr's interactive web proposals close 2-3x better than PDFs on comparable deals. $100k+ deals: DocuSign CLM for contract lifecycle management including redlining, approval workflows, obligations tracking. Third: do you need CRM integration? HubSpot primary: all five integrate but Qwilr has best HubSpot-native integration. Salesforce primary: PandaDoc Business, Proposify Team, Qwilr Enterprise, DocuSign CLM all work. Fourth: payment collection in proposal? Qwilr QwilrPay (0.09% transaction fee Business, 0.05% Enterprise), PandaDoc (Stripe integration), Proposify (limited native payment). Fifth: template library size matters? PandaDoc has 750+ templates (largest), Proposify 75+ professionally designed, Qwilr smaller but higher-quality interactive templates, Better Proposals ~100+ industry-specific. Sixth: agency/reseller use case? Better Proposals has native white-labeling at lower tiers ($39+/user/month) where most competitors require Enterprise tier.
Building Your Business Stack?
Decision-makers comparing tools often need more than one category. Here are related comparisons:
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is Proposify cheaper than Qwilr?
- Proposify is cheaper starting at $19/mo. Proposify starts at $19/mo and Qwilr at $35/mo.
- Which is better, Proposify or Qwilr?
- Qwilr scores 9/10 compared to Proposify's 8.6/10 in our analysis. Qwilr ranks higher on features and value, but Proposify may suit specific use cases — see the feature comparison above.
- Is Proposify cheaper than Qwilr for a team of 5?
- For a team of 5, Proposify costs $19/mo (flat rate) and Qwilr costs $35/mo (flat rate). Proposify is the cheaper option at this team size.
- Are there other proposal & document software alternatives besides Proposify and Qwilr?
- Yes. Our [Proposal & Document Software pricing comparison](/pricing/proposal-software/) page covers all major providers with daily-verified prices. You can also see the [cheapest proposal & document software](/pricing/proposal-software/cheapest/) for budget-focused options.