1v1 Pricing Showdown
ConfigCat vs LaunchDarkly
Side-by-side pricing breakdown for Feature Flags & Experimentation Platforms decision-makers
Prices in USD, verified from the United States. Regional pricing may vary.
When choosing between ConfigCat and LaunchDarkly for your feature flags & experimentation platforms stack, the right answer depends on three things: your budget, the specific features you actually use day-to-day, and your tolerance for renewal-price increases. Below we lay out the prices each vendor advertises today (verified against their live pricing pages), the plan limits that decide whether they'll fit your team, and the features that differ between them.
ConfigCat starts at $110/mo; LaunchDarkly starts at custom pricing. The cheaper headline price isn't always the cheaper total cost — renewal pricing, per-user fees, and overage charges can shift the math. Use the plan-by-plan tables below to model your actual spend.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| flags | 10 free / 100 Pro / unlimited Smart+ | — |
| sdk calls | 5M free / 25M Pro / 250M Smart / 1B Enterprise | — |
| seats | Unlimited all plans | — |
| free tier quality | No credit card, production-ready | Genuinely useful — unlimited flags + A/B tests |
| sdks | 25+ language SDKs | 30 idiomatic SDKs |
| environments | 2 free / 3 Pro / unlimited Smart+ | — |
| sla | Premium on Enterprise+ | — |
| audit retention | 2 years Enterprise+ | — |
| escrow | Dedicated tier only | — |
| flat rate predictability | No MAU billing — flat monthly + SDK call caps | — |
| feature flags | — | Unlimited all plans |
| experimentation | — | All plans — statistical significance testing |
| ai configs | — | Foundation+ |
| session replay | — | 5K free, scales on Foundation+ |
| service connection billing | — | $12/connection Foundation |
| mau billing | — | $10/1K client-side MAU Foundation |
| release automation | — | Enterprise+ |
| guardrail auto rollback | — | Guardian only |
Affiliate links — you pay the same price
Dive Deeper
LaunchDarkly
About the feature flags & experimentation platforms category
Feature flag platforms in 2026 split into four distinct pricing models. Per-seat + usage (LaunchDarkly: $12/service connection + $10/1K client-side MAU) scales linearly with team AND traffic — elegant but expensive at scale. Flat-tier with usage caps (ConfigCat: $110 Pro / $325 Smart / $900 Enterprise monthly, SDK-call-based) is the developer-friendly middle ground. Per-seat only (Unleash: $75/seat/month with 53M requests included) is predictable but can't flex without seat upgrades. Events-based (Statsig: Free 2M events / Pro $150 for 5M + $0.05/1K overage) is the analytics-native model. Split.io's 2024 Harness acquisition (now 'Harness FME') collapsed public pricing into Enterprise-only quote — a significant category shift that pushed many mid-market customers toward ConfigCat and Statsig. The strategic question is no longer 'which flag tool' but 'do you want flags-only (ConfigCat, Unleash), flags + experimentation (LaunchDarkly, Statsig), or flags bundled with a broader DevOps/observability suite (Harness FME)?'
How to choose between feature flags & experimentation platforms options
First: what's your team size and traffic profile? Solo/small team with modest traffic (≤5M SDK calls/mo): ConfigCat Forever Free (10 flags, 5M calls) or Statsig Developer (2M events, unlimited seats) — both genuinely useful free tiers. Growing team (5-20 devs, 5-50M calls/mo): ConfigCat Pro $110/mo flat or Statsig Pro $150/mo — predictable costs, no MAU surprises. Scaling company (20+ devs, client-side SDKs, many end users): LaunchDarkly Foundation pricing is honest but expensive — $10/1K client-side MAU means 100K MAU = $1,000/mo in MAU alone + service connections. Second: do you need experimentation (A/B testing with statistical significance)? Statsig and LaunchDarkly have it natively. ConfigCat and Unleash focus on flags-first; for experimentation you'd add a separate tool. Third: self-hosting requirement? Unleash is the clear answer — open source core + commercial self-hosted Enterprise. LaunchDarkly/ConfigCat are cloud-only (some relay agents). Fourth: DevOps suite consolidation? If you're already paying Harness for CI/CD/IaC, adding FME (Split.io successor) may be cheaper than standalone — if you're not, Harness's quote-only enterprise model makes it a poor fit. Fifth: compliance requirements? LaunchDarkly, Unleash, and Harness all offer SOC2/HIPAA/FedRAMP-capable tiers; ConfigCat and Statsig SOC2 but lighter on regulated-industry features.
Building Your Business Stack?
Decision-makers comparing tools often need more than one category. Here are related comparisons:
Frequently Asked Questions
- Does ConfigCat or LaunchDarkly offer a free plan?
- ConfigCat and LaunchDarkly both offer a free plan.
- Which is better, ConfigCat or LaunchDarkly?
- LaunchDarkly scores 9.1/10 compared to ConfigCat's 8.7/10 in our analysis. LaunchDarkly ranks higher on features and value, but ConfigCat may suit specific use cases — see the feature comparison above.
- Are there other feature flags & experimentation platforms alternatives besides ConfigCat and LaunchDarkly?
- Yes. Our [Feature Flags & Experimentation Platforms pricing comparison](/pricing/feature-flags/) page covers all major providers with daily-verified prices. You can also see the [cheapest feature flags & experimentation platforms](/pricing/feature-flags/cheapest/) for budget-focused options.