Skip to main content
AI Price Scanner | Verified 2026-04-21

Maze logo Maze Alternatives

4 alternatives compared Last verified 2026-04-21 Live pricing

Looking for an alternative to Maze? Whether you need better pricing, different features, or a tool that fits your workflow, we've compared 4 verified user research & testing alternatives below. Every price is checked daily against vendor pages — no stale data, no guesswork.

Prices in USD, verified from the United States. Regional pricing may vary.

Quick Comparison

Alternative Starting Price Free Plan? Score Key Differentiator
Lyssna (formerly UsabilityHub) logo Lyssna (formerly UsabilityHub) $83/mo Yes 9.1/10 Broadest research methodology support in SMB-friendly pri...
UserTesting logo UserTesting Custom No 8.8/10 Category-leading global participant panel (60+ countries)
Hotjar (Contentsquare) logo Hotjar (Contentsquare) $32/mo Yes 8.7/10 Session replay + heatmaps remain category-leading for und...
Ballpark logo Ballpark $25/mo Yes 8.2/10 UK-based SMB-friendly pricing — Pro ~$25/month annual for...

Detailed Alternatives

9.1 /10
Starting at $83/mo

Lyssna (rebranded from UsabilityHub in 2023) is the multi-methodology research platform. Free: 1 study/month + 3 seats + 15 self-recruited responses. Starter at $83/month annual ($996/year) unlocks unlimited self-recruited responses + AI follow-ups + live website testing + 5 seats. Growth at $166/month annual ($1,992/year) expands to 3 studies/month + 15 seats + AI summaries. Enterprise custom with SOC 2 + SSO.

  • Broadest research methodology support in SMB-friendly pricing
  • Starter tier's unlimited self-recruited responses removes volume anxiety
  • Panel access (690K panelists + 395 filters) available pay-per-use at all tiers
Starting at Custom

UserTesting is the enterprise qualitative research category leader. No public pricing — all tiers via sales contact. Industry estimates: Essentials $3,000-5,000/month, Advanced $10,000-25,000/month, Ultimate (POPULAR) $25,000-100,000/month, Ultimate+ $100,000+/month. Global participant panel across 60+ countries. SOC 2 + ISO 27001 + GDPR + HIPAA at Advanced+ tiers. AI-powered analysis at Ultimate+.

  • Category-leading global participant panel (60+ countries)
  • Enterprise compliance (SOC 2 + ISO 27001 + GDPR + HIPAA) at Advanced+ tiers
  • AI-powered analysis at Ultimate+ scales research insights across 100+ studies/month
Hotjar (Contentsquare) logo

Hotjar (Contentsquare)

Free plan Free trial
8.7 /10
Starting at $32/mo

Hotjar was acquired by Contentsquare in 2023-2024. hotjar.com/pricing now redirects to contentsquare.com/pricing — consolidating Hotjar's three products (Observe = session replay/heatmaps, Ask = surveys, Engage = user interviews) into the Contentsquare Experience Analytics platform. Legacy Hotjar pricing: Observe Plus $32/month annual, Business $80/month annual, Scale $171/month annual.

  • Session replay + heatmaps remain category-leading for understanding real user behavior
  • Legacy Hotjar pricing (Observe Plus $32/month annual) was SMB-accessible for session replay
  • Contentsquare consolidation brings enterprise Experience Analytics to mature customers
Ballpark logo

Ballpark

Free plan Free trial
8.2 /10
Starting at $25/mo

Ballpark is the UK-based SMB-friendly video user research platform. Free: 1 test evaluation. Pro at ~$32/month monthly or ~$25/month annual ($300/year): unlimited tests + video responses. Business at ~$64/month monthly or ~$50/month annual ($600/year): team collaboration + custom branding + advanced analytics. Enterprise custom with SSO.

  • UK-based SMB-friendly pricing — Pro ~$25/month annual for unlimited tests
  • Focused simplicity on video-based user testing without methodology complexity
  • Video responses with verbal commentary similar to UserTesting at 1/20th the price

Head-to-Head Comparisons

See how Maze compares directly with each alternative.

Looking for more User Research & Testing comparisons?

See all 5 products compared side-by-side with daily-verified pricing.

Building Your Business Stack?

Decision-makers comparing tools often need more than one category. Here are related comparisons: