1v1 Pricing Showdown
Codeberg vs Gitea Cloud
Side-by-side pricing breakdown for Git Hosting Platforms decision-makers
Prices in USD, verified from the United States. Regional pricing may vary.
When choosing between Codeberg and Gitea Cloud for your git hosting platforms stack, the right answer depends on three things: your budget, the specific features you actually use day-to-day, and your tolerance for renewal-price increases. Below we lay out the prices each vendor advertises today (verified against their live pricing pages), the plan limits that decide whether they'll fit your team, and the features that differ between them.
Codeberg starts at custom pricing; Gitea Cloud starts at custom pricing. The cheaper headline price isn't always the cheaper total cost — renewal pricing, per-user fees, and overage charges can shift the math. Use the plan-by-plan tables below to model your actual spend.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| non profit codeberg ev | German non-profit association | — |
| free for open source | Zero cost hosting for OSS projects | — |
| built on gitea | Uses Gitea as underlying platform | — |
| forgejo hard fork | Codeberg backs Forgejo (Gitea hard fork) | — |
| codeberg pages | Free static website hosting (GitHub Pages alternative) | — |
| woodpecker ci | Free CI/CD (Drone CI fork) | — |
| european data residency | Hosted in Germany — EU data protection | — |
| gdpr by design | EU privacy-first approach | — |
| not for proprietary code | Open-source focus — not suitable for commercial/private code | — |
| donation model | Individual + corporate donations fund infrastructure | — |
| community governance | Non-profit member-driven | — |
| growing oss community | Popular among European + privacy-conscious open-source developers | — |
| lightweight go binary | — | Single executable — no complex dependencies |
| sqlite postgres mysql | — | Flexible database backends |
| mit license | — | Open-source — permissive commercial use |
| self hostable free | — | Community Edition genuinely free |
| active fork forgejo | — | Community-backed hard fork available for hardened alternative |
| gitea actions cicd | — | GitHub Actions-compatible CI/CD (Community Edition) |
| issue tracking | — | Built-in |
| wiki | — | Built-in |
| container registry | — | Built-in |
| package registry | — | Built-in |
| webhooks | — | Built-in |
| ldap oauth | — | Self-hosted authentication flexibility |
| gitea cloud launched 2024 | — | Managed hosting added 2024 — pricing still evolving |
| codeberg uses gitea | — | Non-profit Codeberg hosting built on Gitea |
Affiliate links — you pay the same price
Dive Deeper
Gitea Cloud
About the git hosting platforms category
Git hosting platforms in 2026 operate in a four-vendor oligopoly plus open-source alternatives. 'Microsoft ecosystem' (GitHub Free-Enterprise $0-21+/user/month): acquired by Microsoft 2018 for $7.5B, now the default Git hosting for most developers with 100M+ users. 'Full DevSecOps platform' (GitLab Free-Ultimate $0-29+/user/month): emphasizes integrated CI/CD + security + compliance beyond pure Git hosting. 'Atlassian ecosystem' (Bitbucket Free-Premium $0-7.25/user/month): tightly integrated with Jira + Confluence for Atlassian-native teams. 'Self-hostable open source' (Gitea + Codeberg): Gitea is Go-based lightweight Git server self-hostable free; Codeberg is non-profit Codeberg e.V. hosting using Gitea for open-source projects. AI-powered coding assistants transformed the category 2023-2026: GitHub Copilot (separate add-on $10-39/user/month), GitLab Duo (integrated at Premium+ with $12-24/user/month credits), Bitbucket AI (integrated at Premium tier). Category consolidation continues — Microsoft's 2018 GitHub acquisition + Atlassian's 2010 Bitbucket acquisition reflect the value of developer workflow platforms. Self-hosting alternatives (Gitea, Forgejo fork, Codeberg non-profit) remain relevant for organizations wanting open-source optionality or data residency control. GitLab's 'full DevSecOps platform' positioning differentiates from GitHub's 'Git + Actions + Copilot' modular approach.
How to choose between git hosting platforms options
First: solo developer or team? Solo: GitHub Free (unlimited public + private repos + 2,000 CI minutes/month + Dependabot) or GitLab Free (10 GiB + 400 compute minutes/month). Small team 2-5: Bitbucket Free (up to 5 users + 50 build minutes) is cheapest; GitHub Free also supports unlimited users. Mid-market 5-100: GitHub Team $4/user/month or Bitbucket Standard $3.65/user/month — both excellent. GitLab Free supports 5 licensed users max (then requires Premium upgrade at $29/user/month). Enterprise 100-10,000: GitHub Enterprise $21+/user/month, GitLab Ultimate custom, Bitbucket Data Center (self-hosted). Second: CI/CD volume needs? GitHub Team: 3,000 minutes/month included. GitHub Enterprise: 50,000 minutes/month. GitLab Premium: 10,000 compute minutes. GitLab Ultimate: 50,000. Bitbucket Standard: 2,500 build minutes. Bitbucket Premium: 3,500. Additional minutes: GitHub $0.008/minute, GitLab $10/1,000 minutes, Bitbucket $10/1,000 minutes. Heavy CI teams (50+ developers with 100+ builds/day) will exceed included minutes fast — factor overage into TCO. Third: AI coding assistant? GitHub Copilot separate add-on $10/user/month individual or $19/user/month Business. GitLab Duo Agent Platform integrated at Premium ($12 GitLab Credits/user/month) and Ultimate ($24 credits) with $1/credit overage. Bitbucket AI integrated at Premium tier. For AI-first workflows, GitHub Copilot has largest model + IDE integration breadth; GitLab Duo has tightest integration with CI/CD + security scanning. Fourth: security + compliance requirements? GitLab Ultimate has industry-leading application security scanning (SAST + DAST + dependency + container + secret detection). GitHub Advanced Security (add-on $49/user/month on top of GitHub Enterprise) competes. Bitbucket Premium has basic security features. Fifth: Atlassian ecosystem lock-in? Bitbucket's tight Jira + Confluence integration is genuine advantage for Atlassian-committed organizations. Sixth: self-hosted priority? Gitea (Go-based, single binary, lightweight) is cheapest self-hosted option with active fork Forgejo. Codeberg is non-profit Gitea-powered host for open-source projects — free for OSS.
Building Your Business Stack?
Decision-makers comparing tools often need more than one category. Here are related comparisons:
Frequently Asked Questions
- Does Codeberg or Gitea Cloud offer a free plan?
- Codeberg and Gitea Cloud both offer a free plan.
- Which is better, Codeberg or Gitea Cloud?
- Codeberg scores 8.3/10 compared to Gitea Cloud's 8.1/10 in our analysis. Codeberg ranks higher on features and value, but Gitea Cloud may suit specific use cases — see the feature comparison above.
- Are there other git hosting platforms alternatives besides Codeberg and Gitea Cloud?
- Yes. Our [Git Hosting Platforms pricing comparison](/pricing/git-hosting/) page covers all major providers with daily-verified prices. You can also see the [cheapest git hosting platforms](/pricing/git-hosting/cheapest/) for budget-focused options.