Pricing comparison
Bitbucket vs Gitea Cloud
Side-by-side pricing breakdown for Git Hosting Platforms decision-makers
Each amount uses its recorded currency; no currency conversion is applied. Confirm billing units, commitments, and current regional terms.
Compare the plan that fits your requirements
Check billing units, included usage and renewal terms. Starting prices alone do not establish an overall winner.
Dataset dated 2026-04-21. Sources: Bitbucket pricing and Gitea Cloud pricing.
Affiliate links may earn us a commission. Both vendors remain available for comparison.
Recorded starting rates: Bitbucket $3.65/mo; Gitea Cloud Price unavailable. Billing units and commitments can differ. Compare the plans that include your required features, then request quotes for the same quantity and term.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| unlimited private repositories | All plans | Not recorded |
| jira integration | All plans - tight Atlassian ecosystem integration | Not recorded |
| confluence integration | All plans | Not recorded |
| ci cd pipelines | Bitbucket Pipelines all plans | Not recorded |
| branch permissions | Standard+ | Not recorded |
| merge checks | Standard+ | Not recorded |
| pull requests | All plans | Not recorded |
| ip allowlisting | Premium only | Not recorded |
| enforced merge checks | Premium only | Not recorded |
| deployment permissions | Premium only | Not recorded |
| smart mirroring | Premium | Not recorded |
| build minutes | 50 Free / 2,500 Standard / 3,500 Premium | Not recorded |
| users | 5 Free / Unlimited Standard+ | Not recorded |
| atlassian access sso | Confirm separate identity-service requirements and billing | Not recorded |
| lightweight go binary | Not recorded | Go executable; review deployment dependencies |
| sqlite postgres mysql | Not recorded | Flexible database backends |
| mit license | Not recorded | Open-source - permissive commercial use |
| self hostable free | Not recorded | Community Edition software; infrastructure and operations are separate |
| active fork forgejo | Not recorded | Forgejo is a separate project to evaluate |
| gitea actions cicd | Not recorded | GitHub Actions-compatible CI/CD (Community Edition) |
| issue tracking | Not recorded | Built-in |
| wiki | Not recorded | Built-in |
| container registry | Not recorded | Built-in |
| package registry | Not recorded | Built-in |
| webhooks | Not recorded | Built-in |
| ldap oauth | Not recorded | Self-hosted authentication flexibility |
We may earn a commission through affiliate links.
Dive Deeper
Gitea Cloud
About the git hosting platforms category
Git hosting choices differ in repository controls, CI allowances, security features, and deployment options. GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket offer hosted plans. Gitea includes a self-hosted edition, while Codeberg focuses on open-source hosting.
How to choose between git hosting platforms options
Compare private-repository users, required review controls, CI runner usage, package storage, and identity management. Price AI assistants and security products separately unless the required entitlement is explicitly included. For self-hosting, include infrastructure and administration.
Building Your Business Stack?
Decision-makers comparing tools often need more than one category. Here are related comparisons:
Frequently Asked Questions
- How do Bitbucket and Gitea Cloud prices compare?
- Bitbucket: $3.65/mo. Gitea Cloud: Price unavailable. These are recorded starting prices; compare billing units, included usage and contract terms before treating them as equivalent costs.
- Which is better for my requirements, Bitbucket or Gitea Cloud?
- Compare the recorded features and plan limits against your requirements, then confirm them with each vendor. This page does not establish hands-on testing or an overall winner.
- What happens after the first billing term?
- Use any recorded renewal rate as a dated observation. When a future rate is missing, ask the vendor; do not assume the starting price remains unchanged.