Pricing comparison
Bitbucket vs Codeberg
Side-by-side pricing breakdown for Git Hosting Platforms decision-makers
Each amount uses its recorded currency; no currency conversion is applied. Confirm billing units, commitments, and current regional terms.
Compare the plan that fits your requirements
Check billing units, included usage and renewal terms. Starting prices alone do not establish an overall winner.
Dataset dated 2026-04-21. Sources: Bitbucket pricing and Codeberg pricing.
Affiliate links may earn us a commission. Both vendors remain available for comparison.
Recorded starting rates: Bitbucket $3.65/mo; Codeberg Price unavailable. Billing units and commitments can differ. Compare the plans that include your required features, then request quotes for the same quantity and term.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| unlimited private repositories | All plans | Not recorded |
| jira integration | All plans - tight Atlassian ecosystem integration | Not recorded |
| confluence integration | All plans | Not recorded |
| ci cd pipelines | Bitbucket Pipelines all plans | Not recorded |
| branch permissions | Standard+ | Not recorded |
| merge checks | Standard+ | Not recorded |
| pull requests | All plans | Not recorded |
| ip allowlisting | Premium only | Not recorded |
| enforced merge checks | Premium only | Not recorded |
| deployment permissions | Premium only | Not recorded |
| smart mirroring | Premium | Not recorded |
| build minutes | 50 Free / 2,500 Standard / 3,500 Premium | Not recorded |
| users | 5 Free / Unlimited Standard+ | Not recorded |
| atlassian access sso | Confirm separate identity-service requirements and billing | Not recorded |
| non profit codeberg ev | Not recorded | German non-profit association |
| free for open source | Not recorded | Zero cost hosting for OSS projects |
| forgejo hard fork | Not recorded | Codeberg backs Forgejo (Gitea hard fork) |
| codeberg pages | Not recorded | Free static website hosting (GitHub Pages alternative) |
| woodpecker ci | Not recorded | Free CI/CD (Drone CI fork) |
| european data residency | Not recorded | Confirm hosting location and applicable data-processing terms |
| not for proprietary code | Not recorded | Check project eligibility and licensing requirements |
| donation model | Not recorded | Individual + corporate donations fund infrastructure |
| community governance | Not recorded | Non-profit member-driven |
| growing oss community | Not recorded | Open-source hosting community |
We may earn a commission through affiliate links.
Dive Deeper
About the git hosting platforms category
Git hosting choices differ in repository controls, CI allowances, security features, and deployment options. GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket offer hosted plans. Gitea includes a self-hosted edition, while Codeberg focuses on open-source hosting.
How to choose between git hosting platforms options
Compare private-repository users, required review controls, CI runner usage, package storage, and identity management. Price AI assistants and security products separately unless the required entitlement is explicitly included. For self-hosting, include infrastructure and administration.
Building Your Business Stack?
Decision-makers comparing tools often need more than one category. Here are related comparisons:
Frequently Asked Questions
- How do Bitbucket and Codeberg prices compare?
- Bitbucket: $3.65/mo. Codeberg: Price unavailable. These are recorded starting prices; compare billing units, included usage and contract terms before treating them as equivalent costs.
- Which is better for my requirements, Bitbucket or Codeberg?
- Compare the recorded features and plan limits against your requirements, then confirm them with each vendor. This page does not establish hands-on testing or an overall winner.
- What happens after the first billing term?
- Use any recorded renewal rate as a dated observation. When a future rate is missing, ask the vendor; do not assume the starting price remains unchanged.