1v1 Pricing Showdown
Greenhouse vs Lever
Side-by-side pricing breakdown for Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) decision-makers
Prices in USD, verified from the United States. Regional pricing may vary.
When choosing between Greenhouse and Lever for your applicant tracking systems (ats) stack, the right answer depends on three things: your budget, the specific features you actually use day-to-day, and your tolerance for renewal-price increases. Below we lay out the prices each vendor advertises today (verified against their live pricing pages), the plan limits that decide whether they'll fit your team, and the features that differ between them.
Greenhouse starts at custom pricing; Lever starts at custom pricing. The cheaper headline price isn't always the cheaper total cost — renewal pricing, per-user fees, and overage charges can shift the math. Use the plan-by-plan tables below to model your actual spend.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| industry standard for enterprise | Primary competitor for Lever + SmartRecruiters in enterprise recruiting | — |
| structured hiring | Core differentiator — emphasis on structured interview processes | — |
| no per user pricing | Custom pricing per organization, not per seat | — |
| hiring volume based | Pricing influenced by hiring volume + organizational complexity | — |
| demo required | All tiers require sales contact for pricing | — |
| flexible upgrading | Can upgrade plan at any time | — |
| 3 tier simplification | Simpler than SmartRecruiters' 4-tier structure | — |
| ai features integrated | AI hiring tools across all tiers | — |
| linkedin recruiter native | Tight LinkedIn Recruiter integration | — |
| onboarding with greenhouse onboarding | Separate add-on product | — |
| 600 plus integrations | Largest ATS integration ecosystem | — |
| ats crm unified | — | Unique positioning — candidate relationship management integrated with tracking |
| ai powered candidate matching | — | All plans |
| interview summaries | — | All plans — AI-generated post-interview |
| analytics | — | Comprehensive reporting |
| built in automation | — | All plans |
| linkedin integration | — | Native |
| slack zoom integrations | — | Native |
| hcm integrations | — | HR systems integration |
| onboarding addon | — | I-9 + E-Verify — separately priced |
| ai interview companion addon | — | Structured interview guidance |
| advanced automation addon | — | Workflow automation |
| acquired by employ inc 2022 | — | Parent company of Jobvite + JazzHR |
| phone support 888 885 5299 | — | Phone contact for quotes |
Affiliate links — you pay the same price
Dive Deeper
About the applicant tracking systems (ats) category
Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) in 2026 split by company size and complexity. 'SMB-to-mid-market' (Workable $299-719/month, Ashby Foundations from $400/month): subscription-based with transparent tier pricing, 1-100 employee companies. 'Enterprise custom' (Greenhouse Core/Plus/Pro, Lever custom, SmartRecruiters Essential $14,995+/year): volume + complexity-based pricing, 100-10,000+ employees. Greenhouse remains category leader by enterprise mindshare. Workable's recent pivot (2023-2025) consolidated HR + recruiting into 'Talent Acquisition + HRIS' bundle — unusual positioning competing with Gusto/Rippling (HR) while remaining ATS. Ashby emerged as the developer-friendly challenger with transparent startup pricing ($400/month for <100 employees). Lever is enterprise-focused after being acquired by Employ Inc. (parent of Jobvite, JazzHR) in 2022. SmartRecruiters targets high-volume hiring (retail, seasonal, hospitality, healthcare). 2024-2026 trend: AI-powered features (AI Hiring Agent, AI Talent Matching, AI Notetakers for interviews, Conversational AI Chat) have become table stakes. Integrations with LinkedIn Recruiter, Indeed, job board aggregators are universal.
How to choose between applicant tracking systems (ats) options
First: company size? 1-20 employees: Workable Standard $299/month (bundles HRIS + ATS) or Ashby Foundations ~$400/month. 20-100 employees: Workable Premier $599/month with bundled add-ons, or Ashby Foundations (up to 100 employees). 100-1,000 employees: Ashby Plus custom, Greenhouse Core/Plus custom, SmartRecruiters Essential $14,995+/year. 1,000+ employees: Greenhouse Pro, Lever Enterprise, SmartRecruiters Complete/High Volume, Ashby Enterprise. Second: high-volume hiring? SmartRecruiters High Volume tier is purpose-built for retail/seasonal/hospitality/healthcare with increased SMS + job distribution volume + Conversational AI Chat. Workable High Volume add-ons scale. Third: developer/tech-forward company? Ashby's modern product + transparent pricing + API-first approach appeals to tech companies. Greenhouse remains standard for traditional enterprise recruiting orgs. Fourth: HRIS combined with ATS? Workable bundles HRIS + ATS in Standard plan — unusual in category. Most competitors (Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, SmartRecruiters) are ATS-only, requiring separate HRIS (Gusto, Rippling, BambooHR). Fifth: AI features? Ashby AI Notetaker add-on, SmartRecruiters AI Hiring Agent (Professional+), Lever AI Interview Companion. Workable has AI features across tiers. Greenhouse AI integrated across Core/Plus/Pro. Sixth: add-ons critical? Workable charges $89-109/month for texting + video interviews + assessments as add-ons on Standard tier. Premier includes these. Ashby add-ons: AI Notetaker, Advanced Scheduling separately priced. Greenhouse includes add-ons in higher tiers (Plus/Pro). Seventh: enterprise compliance? Greenhouse Pro, Lever Enterprise, SmartRecruiters Complete all support SSO + SOC 2 + HIPAA BAAs. Smaller ATS (Ashby Foundations, Workable Standard) have basic security.
Building Your Business Stack?
Decision-makers comparing tools often need more than one category. Here are related comparisons:
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which is better, Greenhouse or Lever?
- Greenhouse scores 9/10 compared to Lever's 8.4/10 in our analysis. Greenhouse ranks higher on features and value, but Lever may suit specific use cases — see the feature comparison above.
- Are there other applicant tracking systems (ats) alternatives besides Greenhouse and Lever?
- Yes. Our [Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) pricing comparison](/pricing/ats-recruitment/) page covers all major providers with daily-verified prices. You can also see the [cheapest applicant tracking systems (ats)](/pricing/ats-recruitment/cheapest/) for budget-focused options.